![]()
Chef Timothy Cipriano
Chef Cipriano's passion for children's healthy eating never stops. He always has time to stop by and give children healthy choices. animation by Judy Wilken MS It's the system, stupid! When our child visits their doctor for a check up, their height and weight are measured. Their BMI is calculated. Their medical history is taken. Many questions are asked, and many answers are given. In July of 2010 one more measurement was added to the list of measurements that promised to be a reliable technique for assessing whether a child is overweight or obese. A pediatrician makes a measurement of the circumference of the child's neck. This measurement can tell the physician if the child is obese or overweight. Which side of the fatty fence is the child sitting on? Obese side or overweight side? But recently, there's been a new request from hospital- based pediatricians who see lots of data about childhood obesity and lots of overweight or obese children in a hospital setting. They want all pediatricians to find out what a child's cholesterol level is. Pediatricians have not been asked to determine this level before. Why now? Does this mean the childhood obesity epidemic is getting better or worse? Of course, it means this epidemic is getting worse. Why else would Dr. Stephen Daniels of the Colorado School of Medicine, Pediatric Department, ask for cholesterol levels on children 9 years and older? On the same day as Dr. Daniels' made his appeal to pediatricians, the House made the news with their provision in its agriculture spending bill that would require the USDA to toss out its proposed nutrition standards and start over. The USDA had submitted their proposal for nutrient rich veggies, fruits and whole grains as part of school cafeteria menus. They wanted to limit the weekly servings of white potatoes, lima beans and corn because these foods are highly starchy foods. This House decision to abandon high quality nutrition and medical knowledge about eating these foods on a regular basis and turn their heads to their contributors, especially the large food companies and large food service companies for an answer was not a good decision. It brought no added benefit to school lunches. Naturally, senators from potato states like Colorado, Senator Udall, and Maine, Senator Susan Collins, told house members potatoes were the cheapest veggie in the nation and kids should get all they want. In fact, Senator Collins writes on her site, "Given the sound nutritional facts and the economic implications for Maine's potato industry, I fought to ensure that schools could maintain the flexibility they need to serve healthy meals at an affordable cost. In the end, common sense prevailed." What Senator Collins didn't know and didn't bother to find out is how the simple carbohydrates in the baking potato behave once it is eaten. Dr. Walter Willett in his book Eat, Drink, and be Healthy wrote in 2001, "I've plucked the potatoes out of the vegetable category and put them in the "Use Sparingly" category because of their dramatic effect on levels of blood sugar and insulin. ...The venerable baked potato increases blood sugar and insulin levels nearly as fast and as high as pure table sugar." He goes on to say, "Eating potatoes isn't linked with the same health benefits as is eating other fruits and vegetables. When you eat a baking potato you are eating a simple carbohydrate that causes your blood level of sugar and insulin to rise quickly and then crash. This causes the early onset of hunger pangs. It's like a glucose-insulin roller coaster. As the pancreas pumps out more and more insulin this leads to diabetes." The House has just given families very little flexibility in healthy choices in school lunches. The decision to keep the highly starchy foods that contain easily digested carbohydrates on the menu and making them available to students several times a week is going to have catastrophic effects on many state budgets. Their medical costs for childhood obesity illnesses will be huge! It won't be surprising for physicians to see within the next few years a rise in pediatric care at hospitals and pediatric clinics across the country. High medical expenses for obese children, especially in Maine and Colorado, are going to be in headlines. The House could of- should of consulted with educated medical people like Dr. Daniels of Colorado School of Medicine, Pediatric Department and Dr. Walter Willett of Harvard School of Public Health before they listened to potato lobbyists and frozen food lobbyists who are uneducated in the science of nutrition. Lobbyists don't care about anything but the bottom line of the company they work for. They are hired by the company to say what the company wants said about their product. We all know this. That's why the Occupy Wall Street protesters are out there protesting. This is a no-brainer. It's as if Collins and Udall are saying to us parents, "How dare the USDA to suggest the baking potato be served "sparingly" in school lunches!" Senator Collins' morphing the USDA limit on weekly servings of potatoes into an issue of flexibility for schools and food service companies is not a surprise at all. Remember, this is a political system that she and Senator Udall are operating within. When you operate within a system that allows kickbacks in the food distribution industry and monetary contributions to politicians hooked to food issues and who vote on nutrition issues, graft takes over and fabulous justifications begin to ooze out of the mouths of the receivers of the money. This is the crux of the problem. It's the system that is to blame. The "Occupy" protesters have that part right. The system is one that is allowed to be used to corrupt intelligent reasoning, comprehensive data gathering on issues that affect us and especially our children, the next generation. Stating that food service companies must continue to be flexible to decide which foods are OK to feed our school children is not the reasonable decision by a long shot. |
Potoato in school lunches
Eating a potato causes a sudden spike in blood glucose. This is shadowed by a similar spike in insulin. This is followed by a sudden fall. What does this mean? This sets you up to experience a roller coaster of glucose and insulin. As we all know, there is very little flexibility in a roller coaster ride. All we can do is hang on and wait for it to stop. Let's look closely at what happened in this politically hot issue of serving potatoes in school lunches. Say you are a food company, like ConAgra or Chartwells, and you provide breakfasts and lunches to thousands of schools across the country. Your markup on potato dishes is the largest on your list of dishes. Any dish with potatoes in it is the most lucrative for you. You notice the USDA has recommended that several foods, starchy foods, should not be served frequently in school lunches. The main thing that catches your eye is its recommendation about potatoes, the cheapest vegetable in the nation. The USDA recommends potatoes be served no more than once a week in all public elementary schools. This recommendation will meet the eyes of congress in November of 2011 and it is alerady October. There isn't much time to act.. You think of Susan Collins from Maine and Senator Mark Udall of Colorado, immediately. You recall that you have contributed to their campaigns in the past and now need to morph those contributions into demands. You know all too well that power, their political power, concedes nothing unless they hear demands from you, a huge contributor to their campaigns for re-election. This issue will affect your bottom line if the recommendation from the USDA is honored by congress, so you have to act quickly. You talk with the potato state senators and you all come up with an argument that, if successful, will keep the potato on the plates of thousands of children more than once a week. You and the senators agree that they will play the flexibility argument. It has worked in politics most of the time and should be a piece of cake here. Afterall, we all have the right to serve potatoes as frequently as we want to, the argument goes. (This echoes Asimov's statement, "My ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.") The senators concede to your demands to keep the potatoes flowing in the lunchrooms of our public elementary schools across the nation and they begin to talk to the National Association of Elementary School Principals, the National School Boards Association, the PTA of both Maine and Colorado, Maine and Colorado Potato Boards, and the police associations, trucking companies, restaurants, etc. The flexibility argument performs beautifully with all who hear it. Food service personnel, superintendents of schools, principals, and teachers are all for flexibility in the land of the free; one must have flexibility at all costs to decide how often children should eat potatoes in school lunches. You remind yourself how much you love this system we have where contributions are like chameleons, they change. They change from being contributions to being demands. This is what our political system boils down to. You love it! The senators and everyone else involved forgot to ask one question before their mouths began operating like an out of control sprinkling system. They forgot to consider the child. What happens when a child eats a baked potato frequently? What happens inside his body? Does the child have any flexibility after he eats a potato several times a week? Is this roller coaster of blood sugar and insulin going to hurt him over time? Will he become fat or fatter? The ignorance used in this event will surely create a sudden rise in medical expenses for obese children in the near future. Hide and watch! We urge parents to call their representatives and state senators and inform them of the scientific evidence seen when we eat baking potatoes frequently. This is the only route we have to make things better under the system that we have all helped to create. Don't be stupid! Use your flexibility. That will trump the "chameleon effect". Dr. Walter Willett of Harvard School of Public Health replies "Unfortunately, Congress embedded their changes to the school lunch plan in a broad spending bill that President Obama could not veto. This is a short term victory for potato growers and narrow parts of the food industry, but the losers are our children who will pay in shortened lives and suffering. In the debate about foods in schools, Senator Collins from potato-growing Maine argued that our country could not afford the cost of approximately one billion dollars a year to feed children healthy vegetables instead high-starch foods. This is amazingly short-sighted, because the costs of the obesity epidemic already raging in our children's generation will be many hundreds of billions of dollars over the coming decades. In reality, we can't afford a society burdened with disability at what should be productive ages and ever escalating medical costs." More info at: |
![]()
Babies Are Born With 'Intuitive Physics' Knowledge"Natural interaction with the child, such as talking to him/her, playing peek-a-boo, and allowing him/her to handle safe objects, is the best method for child development |
Buy Now Save a tree..It's an ebook! $9.95StarChild Science: Teach Your Own Ccclick to hear sounds on Earth by GoogleThis feature just added by Google is great for children.Each one of the articles you choose to read on this page is about nature's ways. You can understand these ways more deeply after you read Chapter 7 in our ebook StarChild Science: Teach Your Own Judy Wilken MS Touch Me Feel Me ScienceLiberty Science Center CEO Dr. Emlyn Koster echoes StarChild Science's view about science education in this country. He states in the Wall Street Journal, November 28, 2007, " I am firmly of the view that the lack of connectivity between the traditional outlook of science centers and the science-based challenges and opportunities that confront the world must be remedied." This is precisely what StarChild Science is doing. We are working each and every day, bringing you up-to-date science articles that report on 'science-based challenges and opportunities that confront the world ' ; articles that connect you with people who show excellent focus, high quality standards, and who are working together to solve a problem, answer a question or because they just want to know more about nature's ways. We bring you a connectivity with the real world , real people working together in real time. Union for Concerned Scientists We at StarChild Science ask you to visit this web site of the Union for Concerned Scientists and join us in the signing of a petition to stop the suppression of good scientific findings in numerous areas of research. Chilling
Effect on Scientific Candor Dr. Chu has some ways of looking at the energy problems that can help us understand what must be done.
Soil Science: Healing Our Planet's Ills from the Ground Up |
|